Chris,

Also check out my paper at http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html
which has zillions of pointers to everything.  I'm sorry it's not organized
as well as I'd like; one of these days I'll get time to do that.

CFFI is very good these days.  Do not use UFFI; CFFI is far
better.  We use it at ITA from both SBCL and Clozure CL
(formerly OpenMCL) and it works great.

Also, for sockets, usocket is great; we use that too, replacing
my earlier and clumsier attempt to deal with the problem.

-- Dan

Chris Dean wrote:
> I'm finding that I need to support multiple CL implementations in the
> same code base.  (I've tried to avoid doing this for a long time!)
>
> So I have to questions for any gardeners out there:
>
> - Are there any good libraries that provide a common API for the things
>   like multiprocessing, network programming, POSIX, etc.  I'm looking
>   for direct experience with a package.
>
> - What do people use to compile C code used by an FFI?  I am happy using
>   CFFI, but I also need to create the .so libraries themselves.  What I
>   do right now is use a Makefile (which isn't well integrated with the
>   rest of my asdf world).
>
> (I hope this is enough on topic for the list.)
>
> Cheers,
> Chris Dean
> _______________________________________________
> Gardeners mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
>
>   

-- 
________________________________________
Daniel Weinreb
http://danweinreb.org/blog/
Lisp: Implementation, Semantics, and Practice
http://il09.org


_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners

Reply via email to