We can provide custom turbines; if you will forward your requirements I'll provide you with a quote.
Thanks, Jonathan On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Peter & Kerry <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Liran, > > The 2 second combustion requirement is an Interesting and slightly > disturbing prescriptive regulator response (that narrows gas use options), > is somebody in authority just guessing and being cautious or is it based > around actual gas analysis results from your plasma gasification system? > > What potential constituents in the gas stream are these requirements aimed > at? > > In regard our own experience with gasifying hazardous waste (sewerage > sludge with potential heavy metal contaminants, particularly mercury & > cadmium) the client at the time for this (a large public authority) would > not pay for direct emissions testing covering these so we paid out of our > own pockets for an indirect "indicator" measurement, getting a ultimate > analysis of the raw feed stock and the same test on the ash collected from > the test run, then had a industrial chemist review the results. This showed > the metals identified in the original analysis were captured within the ash > in equivalent amounts relative to the mass reduction from the original > sample (so didn't travel out with the gas). > > Is this a problem with Plasma gasification? Are such contaminants > mobilised in the gas instead? > > We are currently engaged in the early stages of a formal testing project > involving MSW and other hazardous wastes that will have EPA oversight and > permitting for the trial. The results from this will inform pilot > commercial scale system design and operating parameters in regard to > emission management for our own system, so we are interested in what other > regulator agencies are thinking in regard general gasification issues that > might be flagged along the way. > > Otherwise we would agree with Pannierselvam's question. Certainly subject > to your gas meeting all the requirements for gas turbines (not just energy > content) then these combined with downstream HRSG steam units using this > exhaust, perhaps augmented with some auxiliary firing if needed, could be > another way to meet your regulatory requirement. > > At the moment we are unaware of any commercial fuel cells that wouldn't > require a high level of gas polishing and separation without quickly > poisoning the cell, but also would love to hear more. > > Regards, > Peter > > Peter Davies > Real Power Systems Pty Ltd > Australia > > > Steam Turbines > > Liran Dor liran at eer-pgm.com > Sat Feb 11 13:26:27 CST 2012 > Previous message: [Gasification] Steam Turbines > Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > > Dear Pannierselvam, > > Thank you for your reply > > The reason for the rankin cycle is that due to the fact we are treating > hazardous waste the environmental regulation dictate we combust the gas in > a chamber with a 2 second residence time. > > I do like your approach for the MSW application we are working on and > would like to hear more about it. > > Thanks > > Liran > > ______________________________**_________________ > Gasification mailing list > > to Send a Message to the list, use the email address > Gasification@bioenergylists.**org <[email protected]> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page > http://lists.bioenergylists.**org/mailman/listinfo/**gasification_lists.** > bioenergylists.org<http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org> > > for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: > http://gasifiers.**bioenergylists.org/<http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/> > >
_______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site: http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
