Tom,

 

Cristobalite silica is a fact of life with some rice husk gasifiers. You are 
bound to get over 800C with some reactors like updrafts. In the US where more 
than 30,000 tons of rice husk ash are produced from gasification cristobalite 
can exceed the hazardous classification, which I believe is 10%. So the bags 
are appropriately labeled and the material, which is mostly used in the steel 
industry. Is handled accordingly. Cristobalite has also been found in rice husk 
biochar from updraft gasifiers in Australia. 

 

The concern in Mynmar is likely the water pollution from simple scrubbers that 
was identified by Robert. You will remember the Alaska Village Energy Project 
by Marenco in the 1980s. At the time a long list of toxics were identified in 
the scrubber water by Gas Technology Institute. The test facility later became 
a superfund site.

 

While testing an Indian gasifier some years ago we found that the water 
scrubbing system is very good at removing benzene, cresols, etc. The discharge 
from the system contained about five times the concentration of benzene 
allowable by EPA. The hazards are clearly there. EERC has tested and documented 
these. They have worked on various ways to handle tars. 

 

The best solution is to consume the tars in the oxidation process, regardless 
of reactor type. We find that in the simple downdraft designs that are often 
used air penetration is insufficient (which cals to mind your six particle 
theory) so as you increase the diameter of the reactor you wind up with a cold 
(<500C) core through which a lot of tars pass and are created without being 
oxidized. Open core designs also suffer from good air-fuel mixing. 

 

Even with hot dry fuel and good mixing residual tars in the condensate will 
have to be incinerated for zero discharge, which clearly costs more than $100. 
In a small scale demonstration in Cambodia one of my clients filtered the 
effluent and stabilized it with lime.  

 

You will also remember the effort by Mrs. Parikh to develop gasifier standards 
in India in the 1980s. I don’t know if those standards addressed effluents. 

 

A useful reference is the EU Gasification Guide:  “Guideline for Safe and 
Eco-friendly Biomass Gasification” by the European Commission.  

http://www.gasification-guide.eu/

 

Tom Miles

www.gasifiers.bioenergylists.org

        

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Reed
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:09 AM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Myanmar: Engineering society preparing code for 
gasifier standards

 

Tom Miles

 

If there is anything I can do to advise these people day to day on the 
realities of gasification, I'd be happy to help.

 

Ali Kaupp wrote his thesis at UCDavis on rice hull gasifiers.

 

Here's a question for you.  If you pyrolyse hulls at <700C, the resulting 
silica ash is quartz.  If the temperature goes over 800C it comes out 
cristobalite, which is carcinogenic I believe.  

 

Tom Reed


Thomas B Reed 





_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to