Hello gents,
before making money got back in the way of gassing, I too made this benchmark.  
I built a few different rolling barrel shaped screens and made some pressure 
drop measurements with a mock hearth, knowing that the real thing in operation 
would be somewhat different. ending up with several different sized chips with 
different pressure drops per size.  It seemed to me that I came to the 
conclusion that since they are all about the same thickness that the “x” and 
“y” measure didn’t seem to make any real change in test or actual use.  the 
only important revalation  I remember is to screen to get the super fines out 
and not much changes after that.
I’m totally with you Pete, If I can’t use wood chips, I’m done, call me lazy 
that’s fine. But I still wonder how much energy a guy would spend in december 
here in the pacific northwest sifting the fines out and drying the rest to an 
accepable level  vs  the energy made from those now sifted and dry chips. 
It seems like you have to tumble those things to get them to dry out in a 
confined space, as they can sit wet forever in an open bucket and will never 
dry out.  The other option is spread them out thin over acerage on a nice day, 
and then gather them back up.
either way it kinda takes the thrill out of gassing.
I will take it one step further, than you Pete, if I can’t shovel wet/green 
chips into a hopper and make the thing work, then I’m checking out.  I plan on 
working on drying them on delivery from the hopper to the hearth as they flow 
between the two.  Next time I have some “free time”.
I suppose a guy could do a preliminary energy calculation just for fun.  
Energy required to bring “x”pounds of soaked and green wood chips at 60% water 
down to one pound of 20% water wood chips.   Vs the energy that can be made 
from that pound of dried wood chips.
Note,, vent the evaporated wood moisture outside, or everything in your shop 
will get wet and rust in a very quick manner.
Roger that,,,, “along way to go” 
Fuel prep sucks.
Luke




From: Kevin 
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification 
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Wood Chip classificaton

Dear Pete

An "ideal situation" would be if you had a constant flow rate of air, which you 
then flowed through such chips screened to different sizes. Then you could 
measure the pressure drop across a length of the bed. This would tell you just 
how much pressure drop various sizes of chips would give you. Then you could 
decide how small a chip size you could consider using. 

"Too small a chip" will likely give tar, unless the gasifier is specifically 
designed to handle such fine chip sizes. However, this is a lesser concern for 
gasifiers producing "Heating Grade Gas."

Best wishes,

Kevin


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Pete & Sheri 
  To: 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification' 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 6:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [Gasification] Wood Chip classificaton

  Hi, Kevin.

  Thanks for the input.  I had better go out and check the sizes of my screens. 
 

   

    I realize that the APA gauge is focused on thin chips for pulping.  But you 
folks have been telling me that I need thicker chips (in relation to the length 
and height).  I have actually been using a 3 screen system, with a smaller 
screen (1/4” X ¼”) to get the dust out before I even think of saving anything.  

   

  But even with the 1X1 screen, I could get chips that are only 1/32” thick, 
and therefore, very light in weight.

  I am learning that those chips may be okay in some circumstances, but I want 
to be able to see the difference for myself.

   

  I still have a long way to go.

   

  Pete Stanaitis

  ----------------

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin
  Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 2:47 PM
  To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
  Subject: Re: [Gasification] Wood Chip classificaton

   

  Dear Pete

   

  I would suggest that a simpler, and better way to evaluate wood chips is to 
use a  "Two Screen System." For example, if you used square mesh screen with 
1/2"x1/2", and 1"x1" openings, you would end up with 3 products:

  1: +1"

  2: -1", + 1/2"

  3: -1/2"

   

  The APA Gage is intended for a different purpose... to give a reflection of 
wood fibre length, because that is what is important to Pulp Mills. For 
gasifier applications, uniformity of size, and the percentage of void space is 
what is important. The "two screen system" should give screened chips from 
"between the screen decks" that are much more uniform, and having much better 
gas flow characteristics.

   

  Best wishes,

   

  Kevin 

   

   

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Pete & Sheri 

    To: [email protected] 

    Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 3:37 PM

    Subject: [Gasification] Wood Chip classificaton

     

    My only interest for gasifier fuel is wood chips.  If I can’t understand 
them and  make them work well, I won’t be using a gasifier at all.

     

    I know this may be old news to many of you, but I recently found a couple 
of ways to characterize wood chips.  Although there are plenty of good systems 
out there the best ones are way to complex and expensive for me. 

    So,  I am using a simple gauge from the APA (American Pulpwood Association.

      My simple page to explain the process is at:

     

    http://www.spaco.org/Woodgas/WoodChipMeasurement.htm

     

    It has links to a couple of in-depth sources for understanding wood chips, 
too.

     

    Pete Stanaitis

    ----------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  _______________________________________________
  Gasification mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  [email protected]

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
  http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4928 - Release Date: 04/11/12



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to