On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:20:34 +0200, Thomas wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> I found this on their web site under test specifications. > > There is something that does not match. > > 300 grams HC contains appros 12000 KJ and 30 kg CO contains 360.000 > KJ - i a normal gas engine this should be sufficient for production > of 120000 KJ mechanical work on the axel ~ equivalent to 45 hp-hours. ..I lost you here, where did you find those 300 grams of HC??? That's 3.3% pilot diesel oil for ignition??? ..you picked your numbers from here?: http://istenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=232&Itemid=90 ..AFAICT from: http://istenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=164&Itemid=72 they have an 1/3 electric efficiency, and a 78% "boiler efficiency", and a "gross co-generation efficiency" of 63%, which is not too bad. > Any bodu has a suggestion to where it goes wrong? ..my guess is they didn't check their own website, it's flashy etc allright, but has silly spellchecker? errors such as in e.g. FAQ #3 "or uses 120kW of electricity a day": http://istenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=159&Itemid=73 ..these match their "Test Specifications" page: > HC Emissions > > 273 to 420 (g/hp-hr) 2 > > CO Emissions > > 63,100-21,000 (g/hp-hr) 2 > > NOx Emissions > > 399-1,092 (g/hp-hr) 2 -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org http://info.bioenergylists.org UNSUBSCRIBE HERE; http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
