It's completely different in my mind, if Shane is discussing play-calling
and offensive schemes. Those are totally fair game. I just don't think he
should single out players for personal criticism, especially one who gives
everything he has like Tim. If your interpretation is correct, then I'd have
no problem with it. Perhaps Andreu is just stirring the pot to raise his
reader numbers. Anyway, I didn't hear it myself, so I'll just shut up now.
J

 

Rob

 

 

From: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zebulon
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:41 AM
To: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: [gatornews] [SUN]: Come Back, Shane Matthews
(Andreu)

 

 

On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:27 PM, NZ Gator wrote:





This is the first I'd heard of this.  IMO, the numbers don't matter. Shane's
a Gator and Tim's a Gator. Shane, of all people should know how difficult
Tim's role is and he shouldn't be disrespecting him. period. In all kinds of
weather.

 

My read of the comments was not so much a criticism of TT as it was our
play-calling and offensive scheme.

 

A sub-text might be Shane's perceived loyalty to SOS and the downfield
passing game and, therefore, an implied criticism of UMIII.

 

I thought Andreu's comments attributing the comments to jealousy to be both
misguided and factually incorrect, as I'm pretty sure that adding Shane's
1992 bowl game to his stats puts him ahead of TT's passing yardage last
year.

 

I realize that TT did so much more than throw the ball last year, I am just
trying to see if Andreu's facts are correct.

 

-Zeb

 

 



 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to