Question:

What is better for us?  For Texas Tech to win, or Oklahoma?

If Texas Tech wins, obviously they stay ahead of us.  If Oklahoma wins, do they 
jump us?

I am leaning toward thinking that it might be better not to have an undefeated 
TT team in front of us, even if Oklahoma might jump over us in the BCS, but I 
am not sure.  Also, if Oklahoma were to jump us, there would be an even 
stronger argument that Texas should be ranked ahead of us as well, since Texas 
beat Oklahoma.  

Assuming we win out and beat Alabama, are we guaranteed a spot in the BCSCG, or 
just almost assuredly guaranteed a spot?  Let's not take anything for granted.  
Also, if we do make it, who would we rather play?  What is our best-case 
scenario?

Anyway, not that it matters, but I am looking for guidance on who to root for 
this Saturday.

Go Gators!!!!

Ken B. (NYC Gator)

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed

-----Original Message-----
From: "Gatornet Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:23:57 
To: <Gatortalk@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: BCS rankings


I was REALLY hoping we would jump Texas since they struggled with an unranked 
team and we demolished a ranked one. I figure we'll lose points this week with 
the Citadel and needed that jump. Well, maybe we'll jump when we beat f$u.

Randy

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: gatortalk googlegroups 
  Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:47 AM
  Subject: [gatortalk] BCS rankings



  http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/BCSStandings?week=5


          BCS Harris Poll USA Today Computer Rankings 
          TEAM BCS AVG PRVS RK PTS % RK PTS % COMP AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 
        1 Alabama .9787 1 1 2789 .9873 1 1508 .9889 2 25 25 22 23 24 24 .960 
        2 Texas Tech .9698 2 2 2737 .9688 2 1465 .9607 1 24 24 23 25 25 25 .980 
        3 Texas .8911 3 4 2476 .8765 4 1322 .8669 3 23 23 25 24 23 23 .930 
        4 Florida .8755 4 3 2532 .8963 3 1373 .9003 5 21 21 24 20 21 20 .830 
        5 Oklahoma .8388 5 5 2375 .8407 5 1305 .8557 6 20 20 19 22 20 22 .820 
        6 USC .7873 6 6 2304 .8156 6 1245 .8164 8 16 22 20 18 17 18 .730 
        7 Utah .7643 7 8 2014 .7129 7 1113 .7298 4 22 19 21 21 22 21 .850 
        8 Penn State .6957 8 7 2063 .7303 8 1093 .7167 9 17 15 17 13 16 16 .640 
        9 Boise State .6559 9 9 1912 .6768 9 1023 .6708 10 19 16 16 16 14 14 
.620 
        10 Ohio State .6154 11 10 1748 .6188 10 957 .6257 T-11 15 17 15 14 15 
15 .600 
        11 Georgia .6129 10 12 1563 .5533 13 832 .5456 7 18 18 18 19 19 19 .740 
        12 Oklahoma State .5672 13 13 1560 .5522 12 838 .5495 T-11 12 14 12 17 
18 17 .600 
        13 Missouri .5600 12 11 1593 .5639 11 894 .5862 13 14 12 14 15 13 11 
.530 
        14 BYU .4393 17 14 1315 .4655 14 690 .4525 15 11 13 11 8 8 10 .400 
        15 Michigan State .4021 15 16 1151 .4074 15 654 .4289 16 13 7 13 9 6 8 
.370 
        16 TCU .3858 18 17 1039 .3678 17 533 .3495 14 10 10 7 12 12 12 .440 
        17 Ball State .3673 14 15 1271 .4499 16 613 .4020 T-19 8 5 9 3 0 13 
.250 
        18 LSU .2727 20 18 810 .2867 18 429 .2813 T-19 0 11 1 7 11 6 .250 
        19 Cincinnati .2594 22 20 688 .2435 20 358 .2348 17 6 8 10 6 7 9 .300 
        20 Pitt .2171 21 19 749 .2651 19 406 .2662 23 9 0 8 0 0 4 .120 
        21 Oregon State .2027 NR 21 558 .1975 21 321 .2105 T-21 3 9 5 4 4 7 
.200 
        22 North Carolina .1329 16 24 206 .0729 27 70 .0459 18 7 0 6 10 10 5 
.280 
        23 Miami .1023 NR 26 165 .0584 26 74 .0485 T-21 5 0 4 11 9 2 .200 
        24 Oregon .0630 NR 22 221 .0782 22 169 .1108 NR 0 6 0 0 0 0 .000 
        25 Maryland .0550 NR 23 207 .0733 23 140 .0918 NR 0 3 0 0 0 0 .000 


  




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to