THE NEW YORK TIMES 
  February 1, 2007
Tests of Drug to Block H.I.V. Infection Are Halted Over Safety 
By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN
  
Efforts to develop a topical microbicide to prevent H.I.V. infection during sex 
suffered a surprising setback yesterday when researchers announced that they 
had stopped two full-scale trials for safety reasons.
   
  The trials, in Africa and India, involved a chemical, cellulose sulfate or 
Ushercell, and were the second failure of a potential microbicide in a 
full-scale trial in recent years. In one of the latest trials, a standard check 
by an independent scientific committee found an increased risk of H.I.V. 
infection among women who used cellulose sulfate compared with those who used a 
placebo gel. 
   
  In 2000, a large full-scale trial showed that the only other microbicide 
candidate, nonoxynol-9, was unsafe when it had been expected to be effective. 
Subjects in that trial developed a higher incidence of H.I.V. infection, 
presumably through ulcers caused by chemical irritation. 
   
  Yesterday, AIDS researchers at the World Health Organization, the United 
Nations AIDS program and other organizations expressed hope that at least one 
of three other potential microbicides undergoing full-scale testing would prove 
to be safe and effective. The others are Pro 2000 by Indevus Pharmaceuticals, 
BufferGel by ReProtect and Carraguard, whose trademark is held by the 
Population Council. 
   
  “While the closing of these trials is a profound disappointment for the 
microbicide field, we cannot let it paralyze us,” said Dr. Zeda Rosenberg, 
chief executive of the nonprofit International Partnership for Microbicides in 
Silver Spring, Md. 
   
  In the absence of an AIDS vaccine, specialists say development of a 
microbicide is a public health priority, mainly to protect the many women in 
poor countries whose partners refuse to use condoms. Such protection could take 
the form of a gel, cream, film, tablet or sponge that could be inserted into 
the vagina or rectum.
   
  The study that led to stopping the trials involved 1,333 participants in 
Benin, South Africa and Uganda. Conrad, a health research organization in 
Arlington, Va., conducted the study.
   
  Conrad said the independent committee found more new H.I.V. infections among 
those who used cellulose sulfate than among those who used an inactive gel, but 
did not report any numbers. Final numbers are expected in March, a spokeswoman 
for Conrad said.
   
  Family Health International of Research Triangle Park, N.C., conducted the 
second trial involving 1,700 participants in Nigeria. The study found neither a 
benefit in preventing H.I.V. infection nor an increased risk of developing it.
   
  So, given the adverse findings in the Conrad trial, “the responsible course 
of action was to halt our study” also, said Dr. Vera Halpern, the principal 
investigator of the Family Health International trial.
   
  An ideal microbicide would work in three ways. First, it would kill H.I.V. in 
the vagina and cervix. Second, the microbicide would prevent any virus that 
escaped from attaching to a woman’s cells, the way the virus starts to infect. 
Third, for any virus that did enter cells, the microbicide would block an 
enzyme, reverse transcriptase, that the virus needs to replicate.
   
  The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Agency for International 
Development paid $20 million for the two latest studies.
   
  In speaking at the 16th International AIDS Conference in Toronto in August, 
Bill and Melinda Gates were enthusiastic about the prospects of developing a 
microbicide.
   
  Yesterday, Dr. Nicholas Hellmann, acting director of the foundation’s H.I.V. 
and tuberculosis program, affirmed the optimism. 
   
  “We remain hopeful that a safe and effective microbicide will be developed,” 
Dr. Hellmann said, adding that the foundation was still committed to supporting 
research on microbicides and other prevention methods.
   
  The new findings were surprising, researchers said, because 11 smaller trials 
of more than 500 women conducted since 1999 showed that cellulose sulfate was 
safe. The chemical, which was developed as Ushercell by Polydex Pharmaceuticals 
in Toronto, was active against H.I.V. in laboratory tests.
   
  Dr. Peter Piot, the executive director of Unaids in Geneva, said the new 
findings were puzzling because there appeared to be no biological explanation 
for the failure of cellulose sulfate, as there was in the case of nonoxynol-9 
and the ulcers associated with its use.
   
  Finding new drugs like a microbicide often can be a process of trial and 
error, and requires scientifically rigorous trials, Dr. Piot said.
   
  He speculated that one of the antiretroviral drugs used to treat AIDS might 
be needed for an effective microbicide. The world needs a microbicide because 
“the stakes are so high,” Dr. Piot said. 
   
   

 
---------------------------------
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.

Reply via email to