Looking for gay male sex at the supermarket

http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/comment_looking-for-gay-male-sex-at-the-sup
ermarket_1588425


 


 <http://www.dnaindia.com/authors/ashley-tellis> Ashley Tellis | Sunday,
September 18, 2011 

 


Searching for gay male sex in contemporary India is a bit of a minefield.
There seem to be several temporalities at work at the same time and the same
place. Earlier, there used to be just a few types that were more or less
predictable and manageable in one way or another.

These included the married man whose wife was not going down on him (or at
least that was what he said and used as an excuse) and so he was looking for
men; the rough trade on the streets of whichever city you were in (or
village for that matter), desperate and up for anything and anyone you
pretty much picked up off the streets; and the third was the gay man who was
not out (more bottoms than tops), prowling on the internet and willing to be
publicly gay in certain contexts (such as in an NGO office) but not
otherwise. These three types and three temporalities were more or less
handleable - the closet married man, the dehaati rough trade and the closet
queen.

Now, suddenly, there seem to be so many more, besides the above three. There
are more transgender folk, more cross dressers, even the odd guy looking for
a shemale (and actually hoping he'd find one).

Article continues below the advertisement...

There's the self-identified kothi (the new NGO category that suddenly became
an identity in the '90s), the straight guy who, thanks to the new visibility
of 'queerness' in our cities, is up for an experiment (so the straight man
up for it is no longer class-specific, if he ever was), the bisexual guy who
is cool about calling himself bisexual, the full-fledged gay man (usually a
bottom) looking for romance, the occasional muscular top showing off his
boyfriend's profile as much as his own, even the gay activist asking
everyone to protest against a homophobic TV channel and, of course, the
party animal asking where the next underground gay party is.

This would seem like a rich feast and a wonderfully diverse space but that's
an illusion - as much of an illusion as the capitalist supermarket. Old
ideas still circulate under the fairground of the new queer culture. Men
will frequently tell you that they do not kiss (as they always did). It is
really strange this hang-up about kissing, and I think there's something
upper-caste about it - about germs and contamination.

Men will proudly tell you that they do not even kiss women (to which I say
'Yeah, right!) and they will allow you to kiss them anywhere on their bodies
but not on their mouths. But, more disturbingly, it shows an internalised
homophobia. They do not - are not able to - see two men kissing as natural,
right.

The second undercurrent linked to this is that they somewhere think gay
relationships have no stability, no solidity. Most of them will be marrying
women in the end. Only the heterosexual Symbolic gives stability and has
heft. With friends like this, who needs heterosexual, homophobic enemies?
Even the ones looking for relationships somewhere do not believe these are
possible.

The third is that most of these men are selfish and care only about getting
their rocks off and heading home. Whether you have orgasmed or not, whether
or not you are satisfied is just not an issue to them. No sex education also
means no bedroom etiquette at all for almost all of these men. The fourth is
an internalised hatred for gay sex. Even the ones who kiss do not kiss once
they have orgasmed. What does that mean? Why does the partner become
repulsive once one has orgasmed. One thought only straight men did that with
women.

Most of these men are also misogynistic. They are forever asking men not to
be feminine, sissy, girlish and asking such men to avoid them. What does
this say about how they perceive women?

What does this say about how they deal with the feminine in themselves? They
are also asking for 'real men' and want only NSA (no strings attached) sex.

Muscular men are always asking only for other muscular men in a replication
of the clone culture in the white gay world which makes one shudder. It
appears we are always ready to copy the worst aspects of other cultures. The
need for NSA is not because they are individualist but because they see
relationships as outside the gay world which is in any case usually hidden
from their regular lives.

All of this means that in the end one longs for only one of the first three
types I mentioned. The dehaati man who is just honest about getting his
rocks off. If he becomes regular, he may start asking for money but that is
so much more preferable to all the multicoloured, seemingly diverse, soaps
in the supermarket that in the end all smell of the same old shit.

 

 

Email:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay/post?postID=DCvNIbdTv_3_C5j5flK54H
ZuyqMJgNC-L4S3BWR464eSfMgGEAMLax1OSqSI6REqIgVM3LQEejINlemMrw>
modera...@gaybombay.in

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay

http://groups.google.com/group/GayIndia

Public archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gay_bombay%40yahoogroups.com/maillist.html

Rss feed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com/maillist.xml 

GB Internet Radio at http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gayindia.org

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Profile?uid=15084918632470824129

Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

http://twitter.com/gayindia

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/gaybombay

http://www.facebook.com/gayindia

 

Reply via email to