Just a serious query

Which are the places, other than officials, where one can get
temporary permits? One Day Permit?
and How much it costs?

Abhay

On 5/25/12, Bloot Fontaine <blutfonta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Sir, a few years ago, (say approximately five years ago) I could get a
> permit even from a wine shop without the queue etc. by paying double. I
> would go to a wine shop, pay six hundred rupees for three years and go away.
> As the shop was near my office, I went again on any Wednesday. That was the
> day the Excise Officer visited that particular wine shop. He would see me
> and give the permit right away.
> If you have the money, you can have the convenience of getting a permit
> through the wine shop, if this method is still prevalent. And yes, it is
> ENCOURAGING corruption. Sorry about that.
> Regards.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Vikram D <vg...@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: "gaybom...@yahoogroups.com" <gaybom...@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: "gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com" <gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2012 3:56 PM
> Subject: g_b party permits
>
>
>
> This report from the Times of India about the fall out from the rave party
> in Juhu today confirms what GB has been saying for a long time now, which is
> that if you are going regularly to parties it is best to get a permit.
>
> For those who don't know what this is, its a rather absurd document that
> originated in the days when prohibtion was taken seriously, but now is
> retained essentially as a money making racket for the excise department. It
> says that the person holding the permit is allowed to consume alcohol for
> health reasons - basically, saying that you are a licensed alcoholic!
>
> The permit is also used as a convenient way for the police to book people
> from parties. If they can't find any other way to book you, they can usually
> book you for not having a permit, since almost no one does. And the fact
> that you may not drink doesn't really make a difference, since they will
> argue you need to have a permit just to be in a place where alcohol is being
> served.
>
> Its an incredibly stupid and oppressive law, but this combined utility to
> excise and police means its not going to disappear anytime soon. So if you
> are going to parties regularly it is really best that you get one. You can
> get single day permits, and sometimes at GB we can arrange with restaurants
> to take care of this, but not all venues agree to do this, and in general
> its best that you have one (I carry mine with me all the time).
>
> Some big liquor shops will help you with this (usually the day permits), and
> if you're a member of a private club they often do this for members. If not
> you can go to any excise office and do it. You can get single, annual or
> lifetime permits and I think the latter cost around Rs1200/-, but if you can
> afford it, you should just do it. If a party does get raided and the police
> try booking people for not having permits, it might just help you to walk
> away.
>
>
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Ravegoers-face-6-months-jail-for-drinking-liquor/articleshow/13402212.cms
>
> MUMBAI: The police have decided to invoke provisions of the Bombay
> Prohibition Act in the case of the Juhu rave. All those patrons proven to
> have consumed alcohol at the Sunday night party at Oakwood Premier Hotel
> will now be booked for drinking without permits. Further turning on the
> heat, the Juhu police have recommended the cancellation of the police
> licences granted to the hotel.
>
> Ninety-one partygoers were detained by the police from Oakwood on Sunday and
> sent to hospitals for collection of urine and blood samples. "The tests will
> confirm how many of the people attending the party were drunk. Our officers
> are scrutinizing the reports and those found positive will be slapped with
> the Bombay Prohibition Act," said deputy commissioner of police Pratap
> Dighavkar on Tuesday.
>
> Under the act, any person who consumes alcohol without a valid permit is
> punishable under section 66 (1)(b) and can face imprisonment of up to six
> months and/or a fine of Rs 10,000.
>
> "When the detainees were escorted to hospitals, they were asked to produce
> identity proof and liquor permits. But most of them did not have any
> permits," said Dighavkar.
>
>
>


-- 
--- Reuse Paper by Both Sided Printing ----

Reply via email to