Swimmers, divers, gymnasts in that order. I am talking about coaches, of course! :-P On Aug 3, 2012 3:04 PM, "Vikram D" <vg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> ** > > > I'm guessing that even the least sporting inclined among us here is > watching the Olympics, even if India is crashing out almost completely. The > reason of course is - Hot Bodies! In Skin-tight Lycra Singlets, or even > less. > > I mean, did you see the Tom Daley photos? Since he's Brit at a Brit games, > the cameras have been lingering on him, and he's certainly been giving them > lots of reason for lingering: > http://www.afterelton.com/gallery/2012/08/synchronized-sportscake > > Which reminds me, btw, that while India seems to be almost totally out of > the Games, doesn't our one Hotness Hero Sushil Kumar still have to start > his wrestling rounds? So there is still hope, or at least a fair amount of > chance to watch him in his tight tight singlet, lovely scruffy face and > sleepy eyes. Also, what has happened to talldarkandhandsome Vijender Singh? > > Anthony Lane has an excellent piece on Olympic bodies in the New Yorker. > As he points out, one of the attractions of the Games is the sheer range of > bodies on display, so there's something for almost everyone. So while I've > been watching the diving obsessively, the boyfriend is hooked on water > polo, which he insists is better, and I admit he may have a point. As he > says, these are essentially rugby players in small Speedos, you see rather > more of them than the brief flash of diving or swimming and it seems to be > an essential rule of water-polo that you have to grab a butt or crotch > every five minutes or maybe it will count as a foul. > > What do people here think? Does diving score above water-polo or the other > way around? And what are the other sports that are eye-catching? > >
