Thanks, not sure what I was thinking when I wrote that e-mail. An outbound filter will block this vulnerability. -Brian
-----Original Message----- From: Alex Howansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gb-users] Virtual Cracks and Microsoft Security Bulleting MS02-027 > Would a remote access filter block virtual cracks (also called > secondary connections)? No, else your outbound connections would never receive replies. > So I basically need to know if remote access filters supersede virtual > cracks. If not, is there anyway to block virtual cracks for the > Gopher protocol (i.e. TCP port 70). Just block gopher outright with an outbound filter, and you won't have to worry about virtual cracks. -- Alex Howansky Wankwood Associates http://www.wankwood.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive of the last 1000 messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
