SBC has a business class DSL line for about $65.00 per month. For a few
bucks more you can get a block of statics to use as well. This
eliminates the need for logins and PPoE.

I have used it at several companies and it works very well. I currently
have 29 static.

If you are on SBC I suggest changing to a business class and pay the
onetime fee for the IP block. The GTA products work very well in that
environment.

Also, you may consider getting the router option as it is configurable
and allows for better security! Just remember to lock it down tight!!!

Good luck,

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Ayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gb-users] GBFlash to RoBoX VPN via Linksys

I have actually just upgraded it to a static IP for many of those
reasons you pointed out, however, it is still PPPoE.  There is still a
login procedure, but I'm hoping we can keep the line up all the time.

-Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Cox, Danny H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Joseph C. Bender; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gb-users] GBFlash to RoBoX VPN via Linksys


Make life easier on everyone and get the static IP for both VPN ends.
This is only an increase of about $16 per month.

It eliminates the problems commonly seen with PPoE (intermittent loss of
VPN) and reduces the amount time needed to maintain the environment over
time.

Remember, with PPoE, you rotate through IP addresses and that will
directly impact your VPN connection. I have seen this happen at the most
inopportune times - like during a 100Mb upload.

It simply makes good business sense. If "higher ups" are saying to use
PPoE point out that:
1.      there are greater operational costs involved (man hours to
manage)
2.      less stable bandwidth
3.      less support (outages take longer to resolve)
4.      routine loss of VPN when IP rotates
5.      it is far more complicated to troubleshoot because PPoE support
is terrible and without a static address to fire at, you don't have a
solid way of testing each hop for a point of failure.

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph C. Bender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gb-users] GBFlash to RoBoX VPN via Linksys

> We want to setup a GBFlash to RoBoX VPN with an office using
Bellsouth's
> DSL.  The line is routed with a Linksys BEFW11S4.  I plan to get a
> static IP for linksys and forward all the appropriate ports to the
> RoBox.
>
> Has anyone tried this with a linksys?  *snip*
>

Mike,

This is a REALLY dumb question, but is there a good reason you can't put
the RoBoX first, then hang the Router/AP behind it, just using it as a
AP?

This would solve your problem pretty quickly, I'd think.



Joseph C. Bender
IT Systems Analyst
jcbender () burns-wilcox com

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to