If I was GTA I would instead get my existing products function better with
products from other manufacturers. For example, from all the questions put
out on the eGroup so far on GTA to PIX  VPN connectivity, I haven't seen one
workable answer. May be one day we will talk to our other office !!!

ReZ

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Scheldebouw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   16 September 2003 12:45
To:     Paul Emerson
Cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: [gb-users] New GNAT Box hardware.

I understand that customers like to choose from a nice range of different 
boxes. But wouldn't it be cheaper for GTA (and GTA distributors) to have 
two real hardware variations and add features with license keys (and extra 
memory maybe)?
The new GB-200, GB-500 and GB-750 still have license choices for the amount 
of users anyway. The GB-1200 and GB-1500 also look like they could be 
combined into one machine (unless the VPN hardware acceleration is actually 
done in some sort of extra co-processor/DSP). Is there really so much price 
difference between the different models to produce to justify five 
different variations?

Regards,
Benno...

At 07:01 16-9-2003 -0400, Paul Emerson wrote:
>We expanded our product line in response to our customers who indicated
that
>we should have and expand product line.
>
>Paul
>
>On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 at 05:48, Scheldebouw wrote:
>
> >Look at al the pretty new boxes at http://www.gta.com  :-)
> >
> >Any comments on the specs? I think 2 different hardware models (RoBox
like
> >and the new GB-1500) with license variations (on users, connections and
> >VPN) could have been enough right?
> >
> >Benno...

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to