The log message indicates that the packet is a TCP Reset (flag=0x4) packet.
This message just indicates that a Reset packet was not expected, (as Reset
packets are generally used to terminate/reset a session).  Could also be a
case of someone forging a packet and sending the reset to screw things up or
attempt to hijack a session, (possible but maybe unlikely).  Since you'd send
a Reset to one side while you jump in the middle and start talking to the
other.


On Thursday, February 26, 2004 at 08:13, Jason Sopko wrote:

>I am getting a lot of these error messages in my log files on an older
>GB-1000:
>
>Feb 26 07:58:54 orpheus id=firewall time="2004-02-26 07:58:54"
>fw="orpheus" pri=4 flt_type=default flt_action=block msg="Rejecting
>unexpected packet" proto=25/tcp src=62.90.145.131 srcport=3389
>dst=66.207.128.61 dstport=25 interface=fxp1 flags=0x4
>
>Feb 26 07:58:54 orpheus id=firewall time="2004-02-26 07:58:54"
>fw="orpheus" pri=4 flt_type=default flt_action=block msg="Rejecting
>unexpected packet" proto=25/tcp src=209.195.183.177.46 srcport=3389
>dst=66.207.128.62 dstport=25 interface=fxp1 flags=0x4
>
>Feb 26 07:58:57 orpheus id=firewall time="2004-02-26 07:58:57"
>fw="orpheus" pri=4 flt_type=default flt_action=block msg="Rejecting
>unexpected packet" proto=25/tcp src=69.6.77.186 srcport=47162
>dst=66.207.128.62 dstport=25 interface=fxp1 flags=0x4
>
>These are legitimate packets that are inbound destined for internal mail
>servers, and should be allowed into my network. I was first alerted to
>the problem yesterday, when I was told by another sysadmin that he
>couldn't send me email, as it was being returned to him after his mail
>server gave up trying to send it to my mail server.
>
>This prompted me to review my log files, and I noticed that this
>behavior was happening over the past year and a half. There are messages
>such as these in the logs since I've installed the firewall (was
>purchased used).
>
>I'm running GB-1000 Version: 3.3.4s. The firewall seems to be working
>fine otherwise, as other mail servers connect fine, as do my mail
>servers connect fine outbound. Other services are working fine, also,
>including ssh, http, https, imap, imaps, pop3, ftp, etc. Both inbound
>and outbound. So the problem appears to be sporadic, and not from any
>specific subnet/s.
>
>Is it possible that this firewall is starting to die? If anybody can
>shed some light as to what might be happening, I would appreciate it.
>Thanks in advance.
>
>///Jason
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archive:  http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
>
>
--
Paul Emerson                       Global Technology Associates, Inc.
Tel: +1.407.380.0220               http://www.gta.com/
Fax: +1.407.380.6080               Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mob: +1.407.617.7818               AIM: pje1gta

------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive:  http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/

Reply via email to