Hmmm....very interesting. Have you been sitting in on our development meetings?
The feature Chris has described is something GTA is currently developing. Any comments/input on this feature are welcomed, (we don't want to leave something out). I can't give you a specific date for this feature's release at this time, but it is in the development cycle. Paul On Tuesday, March 01, 2005 at 10:06, Chris Green wrote: >I have a client with a 768kbps burstable frac-T1. We would like to offload >all of the web browsing traffice to a $30/mo charter cable modem to speed up >browsing and conserve our regular bandwidth for more important tasks. We >were already working on implementing a GB-Ware with content filtering, >however throwing this into the mix complicates things completely. I can't >think of any way within the GB-Ware to force web traffic out a particular >connection as I'm not aware of any policy-based or content-based routing >features. > >The simplest solution that I can come up with would be to install a Squid >box on the cable modem and have the browsers configured to proxy there. >This would defeat my content filtering completely. I really don't want to >put in two separate GB-Wares with both having content filtering >subscriptions. Any ideas? Any features that I'm just overlooking here? > >Chris Green > >------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Archive: http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/ > > -- Paul Emerson Global Technology Associates, Inc. Tel: +1.407.380.0220 http://www.gta.com/ Fax: +1.407.380.6080 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mob: +1.407.617.7818 AIM: pje1gta ------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive: http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
