------- Additional Comments From gj at pointblue dot com dot pl 2005-01-27 13:46 ------- Subject: Re: openssl speed compiled with 20051020 gcc-4.0 (HEAD) segfaults
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 06:24 > ------- > I say you've completely mis-diagnosed the problem, since "0x66 0x66 0x90" > is a PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE x86-64 nop sequence. > sure, but that still doesn't make this bug not valid. It does it on any amd64 machine I have here. It doesn't do it on sparc32 (with 64bit kernel). I don't have any other arch to test it on. Hence, if someone would be so kind and test it for me. Either deny or will get the same resoults. I am very much in doubt this is caused by binutils. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19558
