------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 15:07 ------- Is it desirable to have all memory allocated by the GC executable though? I think libgcj always knows in advance what memory will it need executable, so wouldn't it be better to provide separate allocation entrypoint (I think void *GC_malloc_atomic_executable (size_t) would be enough) that would be giving executable memory and otherwise you'd get non-executable one (if OS allows that)?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19823
