------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:46 ------- Testcase: struct temp { temp(){} ~temp(){} temp(const temp&){} }; struct crop { int ox, oy, dx, dy; }; struct Parm { temp filename; crop cp; }; void Foo(Parm x); void Bar1() { Parm p; p.cp.dx = 0; Foo(p); } void Bar2() { Parm p; p.cp.dy = 0; Foo(p); }
the problem is that Parm's copy constructor is at line 21 which is wrong. This is a regression from earlier 4.0's where the copy constructor was not generated lazy. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-23 14:46:15 date| | Summary|Wrong line number in |[4.0 Regression] Wrong line |diagnostic with gcc 4.0 |number in diagnostic with | |gcc 4.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20164