------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-28 04:24 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18145 ***
sorry, no. - that bug says don't copy when there's no data to copy. - this bug says, don't static read-only data even if present, as it should be read read-only data should not be copied to read-write memory to be then only copied again; as little as a few KB of such data could effectivly consume all of RAM relegating the entire RAM useless. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20243
