------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01 12:39 ------- Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for function parameter
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:- > Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic that "static const" > already does just that, as it specifies the storage class and access What if it were the pointer that was like this? You need a type qualifier, not a storage class. Neil. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20258