------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-04 15:26 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Everybody who works on the AVR toolchain knows that it would be desirable to > have attributes to allow objects to be put in and accessed in different > address > spaces. This has nothing to do with this bug report. Who are you trying to > convince? Please refrain from muddying the waters with comments that have > nothing to do with the issue at hand. You're just wasting bandwith.
(Although I know I should simply ignore ignorant comments, I feel compelled to respond. I pre-apologize, and will not continue the response further than): Eric, I'm glad it's obvious to you; maybe you'd consider attempting to technically contribute to the refinement of AVR's GCC port; as opposed to feeling overly empowered playing secretary for the WINAVR product in which you've obviously never technically contributed to the refinement of the GCC port which it's based upon, but instead apparently feel compelled to exert influence over what appears to obviously be beyond your intimate familiarity, and likely skill set to productively technically contribute towards yourself. (Admittedly I am no GCC expert by any stretch of imagination, but observe that in my relatively short tenure attempting to familiarize myself with both GCC's architecture and the AVR port sufficiently to productively contribute to their refinement, I've likely already contributed more (which isn't saying much) than you would appear to ever likely accomplish; so please try to tone down your misplaced opinions on subjects and people you're clearly predominantly ignorant of.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20288