------- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-03-08 02:18 ------- Subject: Re: 20021014-1.c fails on account of unsupported build option
At 07:10 AM 3/7/2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot >org 2005-03-07 15:10 ------- >A better way is do error this out just like xstormy16 and/or freebsd >instead of what you did. > >-- > > >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 If I understand the purpose of the test, it was to check whether profiling is working correctly, as far as being capable of building and running without a failure report. I've not found an explanation why certain targets, like cygwin, support only -pg, others only -p, and others both. The main point is to stop reporting a spurious error when running the testsuite. Tim Prince -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360