------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 19:46 ------- Hmm, I think this is a reload or a recognizing problem. inside reload (when adding the LABEL_REG), we have the following instruction: (jump_insn 169 222 170 19 (set (pc) (label_ref:DI 172)) 515 {*indirect_jump_rtx64} (nil) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:DI 66 [ #ref#6#19 ]) (nil)))
But this is not an indirect_jump_rtx64 at this point but instead just a jump. I cannot debug it further than this sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20606