------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 17:09 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > Second why are you using STLport instead of the GCC's libstdc++? > > Because we had problems with the default GCC STL in the past, so we switched > to > STLport. We are also working cross-platform (GCC for linux and MSVC6 for > win32) > and having the same STL in both versions gives you the security, that the > behavior is the same (well...kind of...at least the behavior should be closer > than STLs from two different vendors)
Well considering STL is standardized now and has been since 1998 I really doubt there is any problem any more and if there is a different behavor, it might be undefined by the standard or a bug in one of the STL implemenation. But anyways I will look into reducing the preprocessed source. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20624
