------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-03-26 04:20 ------- Subject: Re: error: '<anonymous enum>' is/uses anonymous type'
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Intuitively, C++ treats unnamed enums differently than named ones, because | in templates the function/class name has to be mangled, and will contain | the name of the template arguments. If the template argument doesn't have | a name, then the compiler can't do its job, so the standard chose to | disallow unnamed enums as template arguments. | I know what the standard says, but the arguments used to make that rule are bogus. Those are on my list of things to fix for C++0x. If it were only mnagling, then the compiler can concoct a unique name for manglaing purposes. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20589
