------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-26 11:59 ------- Subject: Re: Do not print default template arguments in error messages
gdr at integrable-solutions dot net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> The first patch will deal with just removal of default >>>> arguments, and I believe that the less intrusive and clean >>>> solution is to >>>> display <default> in the "with" clause. >>> please: >>> (1) don't do an unconditional removal; >>> (2) don't show <default>. >>> I would oppose any patch short of that. >> >> Yes, the remove will be conditioned on a flag (but I believe this >> has to become >> the default). > > which flag? A compiler option? I don't think a multiplication of > compiler options for this stuff is a good way to go. Then what? You said "don't do an unconditional removal". What did you mean, exactly? Giovanni Bajo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14912
