------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-31 21:14 ------- I should also add, that, in general, your snippet could be simpler, without penalizing the performance: typically reserve is only called once, at the outset, if we can estimate in advance the final size of the string. Otherwise, internally, the implementation is *automatically* able to quickly grow the capacity to satisfy efficiently a series of consecutive append: in our implement the capacity automatically doubles every time is reached by the size of the growing string.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20706
