------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de  2005-04-01 
13:34 -------
This patch fixes the test case.  It also includes my
EOR patch for advancing I/O.

This is regression-tested on mainline.  I'll submit a proper
patch when I have finished regression-testing it on 4.0.

--- transfer.c.orig     2005-03-25 14:35:29.000000000 +0100
+++ transfer.c  2005-04-01 15:34:19.000000000 +0200
@@ -150,7 +150,12 @@ read_sf (int *length)
   else
     p = base = data;

-  memset(base,'\0',*length);
+  memset(base,' ',*length);
+
+  /* If we have seen an eor previously, return blanks.  */
+
+  if (sf_seen_eor)
+    return base;

   current_unit->bytes_left = options.default_recl;
   readlen = 1;
@@ -179,12 +184,6 @@ read_sf (int *length)

       if (readlen < 1 || *q == '\n' || *q == '\r')
        {
-         /* ??? What is this for?  */
-          if (current_unit->unit_number == options.stdin_unit)
-            {
-              if (n <= 0)
-                continue;
-            }
          /* Unexpected end of line.  */
          if (current_unit->flags.pad == PAD_NO)
            {
@@ -193,8 +192,13 @@ read_sf (int *length)
            }

          current_unit->bytes_left = 0;
-         *length = n;
           sf_seen_eor = 1;
+
+         if (advance_status == ADVANCE_NO)
+           ioparm.library_return = LIBRARY_EOR;
+         else
+           *length = n;
+
          break;
        }

@@ -748,6 +752,9 @@ formatted_transfer (bt type, void *p, in
          internal_error ("Bad format node");
        }

+      if (ioparm.library_return == LIBRARY_EOR)
+       generate_error (ERROR_EOR, NULL);
+
       /* Free a buffer that we had to allocate during a sequential
         formatted read of a block that was larger than the static
         buffer.  */
@@ -1223,7 +1230,10 @@ next_record_r (int done)
       length = 1;
       /* sf_read has already terminated input because of an '\n'  */
       if (sf_seen_eor)
-         break;
+       {
+         sf_seen_eor=0;
+         break;
+       }

       do
         {


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20661

Reply via email to