------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz  2005-04-05 09:46 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures on ia64-hpux

> 
> ------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-05 
> 04:04 -------
> The patch seems to have been incompletely checked in.  The ChangeLog entry
> claims to be removing code from final.c, but the code is still there.
> 
> I laboriously tracked down the problem to the fact that cgraphunit handles
> ADDR_EXPR but not FDESC_ADDR.  Hence, only targets that use function 
> descriptors
> are affected.  Like IA-64.

This sounds like reason for the failure.  What precisely is the
behaviour of FDESC_ADDR?  (ie should I behave same way as if I see
ADDR_EXPR - assume that address of the function has been taken and thus
it is neccesary?).

Honza
> 
> 
> -- 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>      Ever Confirmed|                            |1
>    Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-04-05 04:04:14
>                date|                            |
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20717
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20717

Reply via email to