------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06
06:56 -------
> Richard,
> I think we should probably close this one unless we actually get a chip part
> that has this failing :)
...or at least get some documentation about what the hardware
limitation actually is. ;)
I was keeping this open (but suspended) so that we could track
the fact that gcc doesn't work around this particular problem.
But I agree that there's not enough information here to be useful.
We can always reopen the PR if someone does provide the docs
(although we'd probably just suspend it again, unless someone's
actually volunteering to implement the workaround).
Richard
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13309
