------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11 17:35 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Do you happen to know whether there's a C99 issue to fix the footnote?
If you read that bug's comment, you will see in comment #8: "My recollection from last time we were discussing this is that text above is an footnote that is not normative and in conflict with rest of the standard, so it needs to be ignored. While I agree that this behaviour is very unfortuante side effect of va-arg implementation, there are some other ABIS around (PPC SysV) doing the same so the only choice now is probably to avoid this construct." -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20951
