------- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-15 11:29 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I believe that reshape needs the same/similar fix. > Is ret->data = NULL guaranteed for temporaries?
ret->data = NULL is what the front end generates when it doesn't know enough about the temporary. > This is what I would have done but the question that I asked on the > original PR is still unanswered - is it the caller or the callee who > should be arranging the correct amount of memory for a temporary object? Ideally, it should be the caller, but that doesn't happen always at the moment. Thomas -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18495
