------- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-17 03:06 ------- Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On 16 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 16, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does this clear things up? Do you agree? > > Yup, for both questions. Thanks for the clarification. It wasn't > clear to me that the assignments played any useful role, as soon as I > found out the givs could be assumed to hold the correct value. It > all makes sense to me now. Your patch (in comment #45) is OK for mainline, with a suitable ChangeLog entry. Hurray, we can close the PR. Roger -- -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126
