------- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-23 14:06 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > >>Any pointers as to why this is invalid? > > > > 12.4.1.2 > > > Hm, I can't see that there. Looks like I'll have to find out which term has a > definition different from what I'm thinking ...
Notice how 'internal procedure' is missing in the first sentence. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20861
