------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-04-23 15:46 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range building 176.gcc with -O2
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:11:52PM -0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 > 15:11 ------- > (In reply to comment #13) > > > > I would like to, but currently my patch causes a regression in one of > > the VRP testcases. > > Kazu, which test case is this? Send me details? I'll look at this next week. In the meantime, I would rather have sub-optimal code than a broken FE. > I haven't checked 4.0.0 against my Fortran > testsuite; hopefully, this problem isn't present in > gfortran's first exposure to the world. > No. VRP is a 4.1 feature. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21030