------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-02 12:02 ------- Two quick comments: 1- I'd like to keep open either 10350 or this one, I don't see much value in keeping open both. Ok? 2- I'm not aware of any real cure for this kind of problems within a RC implementation. Are you? For what is worth, in the v7-branch there is already a basic_string framework for flexible memory management policies and I have already prototyped an additional policy not using RC at all. I'm planning to add it the repository very soon. This is stuff that breaks the 3.4/4.0 ABI of course, but if people want it we can envisage providing it as an extension in future 4.0.x releases.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
