------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 16:36 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > We no longer fail with this code on the mainline but most likely because > actually thread the jump > which I was taking in comment #5.
Let me rewrite that. This now works on the mainline. This is most likely due to the jump threading changes in which we actually catch the threading on the tree level instead of waiting until the RTL level which causes the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20606
