------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-13 20:39 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test fails on hppa64-hpux
On Fri, 13 May 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: > Given our current basic_string implementation (which I'm maintaining) I can > tell you that this testcase is very brittle: see 19495, that lead to the > xfail for powerpc, for additional details. Benjamin's changes cannot have > directly caused the fail and, IMHO, represent a very welcome clean-up. So this should be treated as a known latent bug, a testcase which fails or passes at random on targets requiring strict alignment? In which case there should be an effective-target keyword for strict alignment and the testcase should be xfailed on all such targets? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21554
