------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-05-16 19:19 ------- Subject: Re: Possible bug
"sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (In reply to comment #7) | > > Is there a way to distinguish between unions (which are not usable as base | > > classes) and classes? If not, the standard is incomplete. | > | > You should know that 10 years ago people didn't even imagine the kind of | > template usages that you are assuming as obvious. Indeed, everyone wants | > to tell unions from classes now and you bet, it will be possible sometime | > in the future, likely not using SFINAE at all. | | I know and accept this. SFINAE is a possible dangerous feature, anyway. It may | be better if the ISO standard declares something like the following | (incomplete, feel free to propose it to the standard comitee): | | The pragma statements | | _Pragme(set, "sfinae", on) // enables SFINAE | _Pragma(set, "sfinae", off) // disables SFINAE | _Pragma(reset, "sfinae") // sets SFINAE to the previous state Over my dead body. :-) -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21510
