------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-05-18 11:19 ------- Subject: Re: COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77
toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl > 2005-05-15 11:32 ------- > Subject: Re: COMPLEX function returns incompatible with > g77 > > tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > >>------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 >>22:23 ------- >>Fixed on the mainline. I will commit this to the branch after the obligatory >>testing and the necessary changes (unfortunately -fsecond-underscore became >>the >>default on the branch). > > > [ Sorry for the late reply ] > > I wonder if that really means we have to stick to -fsecond-underscore on > the 4.0 branch. Only 4.0.0 is out, and it is very probable that > *nobody* uses it for any serious work in Fortran anyway. > > I feel we can safely change the default, even on the branch. I'm also inclined to doing this, 4.0.1 will probably be vastly more usable than 4.0, but I'd still like to get feedback from the list. It's really a minor incompatibility. Especially since a lot of people seem to use '-fno-second-underscore'. - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20178
