------- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2005-05-19 09:45 ------- (In reply to comment #38)
> > My backtrace looks suspiciously similar to the backtrace reported in > > comment #14. > > Yep, yours is probably the same bug as that in comment #14, which I don't > think is related to the original bug report. 20949 was opened for that > bug, then closed for lack of a testcase. Ah, OK. Then I think this bug should be closed: the patch is already applied and the other testcases (comment #1, comment #2 and comment #4) all work for me. > > Reducing a testcase isn't trivial, but I'll try. > > Thanks. If you do come up with one, it probably makes the most sense to > attach it to 20949 and reopen it. Will do. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19317
