------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 03:44 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > See also http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=111238996923252&w=2 > which says > > --- snip --- > gcc-4 miscompiles inline assembly bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c so that the > functions bn_add_words and bn_sub_words are broken and segfault.
Actually the inline-asm is questionable, see PR 20718 and it is not a regression by the way, people just got lucky with older versions of GCC with that inline-asm. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19558
