------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-07 18:12 ------- > You may retartget this pr to fixing the silliness in libstdc++, if you want.
And the "silliness" would be? Personally, I'm finding quite a bit of silliness in this remark, to tell you the truth and indeed, mainline is ok, probably the current compiler judges that "silliness" not so silly, after all. When -fno-exceptions, the catch becomes simply an 'if (false)' and I don't see why the implementors of v3 have necessarily to care about the branch not returning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21951
