------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-14
10:36 -------
A change like this:
static void
+eoshift0 (gfc_array_char * , const gfc_array_char *,
+ int, const char *, int);
+
+static void
eoshift0 (gfc_array_char * ret, const gfc_array_char * array,
int shift, const char * pbound, int which)
doesn't have any effect, since a function definition in non-K&R
style already provides prototype information to subsequent code,
same as a function declaration does. (A declaration is useful
and required at places where the function definition is *not*
already seen.)
In fact, I thought that since we require C89 for the C parts of
the compiler, the coding style recommends *not* providing such
superfluous declarations ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21594
