------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-24
13:37 -------
> > It could be fixed by backing out Nathan's patch (that, to the best of my
> > knowledge didn't fix a regression).
it did not fix a regression, but was something we wanted added (as I beleive
things like Boost were having problems). I waited a while after applying to
mainline to see if there were any problem ...
>
> I've CC'd nathan -- but he's on a plane over the Atlantic right now, so
> I'm not sure we'll get a quick response. In any case, I think we can
> live with this until 4.0.2.
I'll have a look and see if the fix is 'trivial'. My inclination is that if it
is not, then we should do nothing for 4.0.1
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-28 17:55:16 |2005-06-24 13:37:20
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21799
