------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 16:21
-------
(In reply to comment #1)
> INT_MAX/-1 is undefined.
> and signed overflow is undefined.
>
> Why file this bug when the comments on the list say this is not a bug?
(In reply to comment #5)
> Actually it is modulo for all operations.
> and INT_MAX/-1 does not raise a trap.
Andrew --
You do not seem to understand this PR. Please DO NOT close it.
Your eagerness to close PRs is doing harms -- that was already debated
last couple o weeks and I do not want to repeat that again.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200
