------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 23:20 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with > arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++ > frontend and crashes the optimizers: Actually it is valid C. because "void f()" in C means the same as "void f(...)". My testcase was to show the wrong code at the time.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20256
