------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-02 20:38 ------- According to Joseph Myers, the question is whether this counts as "access" to a volatile object, which is implementation defined (6.7.3#6). However, extend.texi doesn't answer this, so I'll reopen it as a documentation problem. We could then either document it does not constitute an access, or change the behavior and state that it does.
-- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Keywords| |documentation Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278