------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org  2005-07-02 20:38 
-------
According to Joseph Myers, the question is whether this counts as "access" to
a volatile object, which is implementation defined (6.7.3#6). However,
extend.texi doesn't answer this, so I'll reopen it as a documentation problem.
We could then either document it does not constitute an access, or change
the behavior and state that it does.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
           Keywords|                            |documentation
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278

Reply via email to