------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-02 20:38
-------
According to Joseph Myers, the question is whether this counts as "access" to
a volatile object, which is implementation defined (6.7.3#6). However,
extend.texi doesn't answer this, so I'll reopen it as a documentation problem.
We could then either document it does not constitute an access, or change
the behavior and state that it does.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Keywords| |documentation
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278
