------- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-07-05 12:11 ------- It seems to me that this is just a simple NAB. There seems to be 3 options 1) Just leave it as is 2) Alter list::remove so in debug mode it aborts if you give it an element from the list 3) Alter list::remove so this code works (which in some very quick checking seems to produce about a ~15% slowdown on things like list<int>s)
The similar problem on things in <algorithm> I think is more cut (if you pass something by reference to an algorithm, that algorithm shouldn't change it, clearly). This could still perhaps be made clearer in the standard... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17012
